By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
VICIOUS transgender activists are using Queensland and other states’ slimy, communist-style anti-vilification legislation to bankrupt Australians – mostly women at this stage – by convincing courts to impose outrageous fines against those who dare speak out against the warped transgender attack on gender reality.
And at a federal level, the Liberal Party is grovelling to the Jewish lobby who want to punish people who dare criticize the Zionist state as “anti-semites”. The Liberals are also bending to Jewish demands that they decide the terms of the Royal Commission into the Bondi Massacre.
Several Queensland cases in which people are being hauled before courts for expressing their political opinions could have been prevented if Premier David Crisafuli had the willpower and guts to repeal anti-discrimination and “vilification” laws that transgress the sacred right of free speech that Liberals traditionally supported.
Freedom of religious speech and belief is already clearly protected under Section 116 of the Constitution, but Labor-Green governments have been doing their best for decades to legislate around that by using anti-discrimination and vilification laws to silence dissident voices who dare criticise cultural Marxist gender and gay activists.
In Queensland Muamer Nukic, a member of the Queensland Police Service’s Protective Services Group and a self-described anti-Zionist, has been charged with 41 counts of using a carriage service to menace, harass, or cause offence over alleged “anti-semitic comments” on social media.
Shane Dowling of Kangaroo Court Australia (see video above), believes two key elements suggest that Nukic has been “stitched up on false charges and is being persecuted”.
“Firstly, key evidence produced in court … doesn’t support an alleged crime on antisemitism. And secondly, the police prosecutor wanted bail refused in a case relating to social media posts, which is scandalous.”
Dowling says that with governments around the country either introducing, or planning on introducing, new so-called hate speech laws his article is “a must read”.
Meanwhile the conservative Human Rights Law Alliance (HRLA) says a landmark case heading to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) could determine the future of public discourse, especially concerning women’s rights, children’s health and freedom of expression.
Former breastfeeding counsellor Jasmine Sussex is defending a vilification complaint brought by a “transgender-identifying man” under Queensland’s discrimination laws – not merely for her words, but for publicly raising concerns about the safety of induced “breastfeeding” by men.
According to coverage in The Australian, the dispute centres on whether Jasmine’s public commentary — grounded in years of experience supporting mothers and their babies — falls within the scope of protected speech or crosses into punishable conduct.
Ms Sussex told The Australian that her statements were made in defence of maternal rights and the safety of mother-baby relationships, not to vilify individuals. She has emphasised that her concerns are about infant welfare and the biological foundation of breastfeeding.
At HRLA, we see this case as far more than a personal dispute — it has significant implications for the freedom of Australians to speak about contested social topics, including sex, protection of women, and children’s wellbeing.
John Steenhof, Principal Lawyer at HRLA representing Jasmine, told The Australian: “It’s not going to be a case that’s going to come to a definitive position on what is right and wrong in those particular issues, but whether we’re allowed to speak about them.
“It’s important for a good, robust, open political debate that people are able to speak without fear of the law being used to silence their opinion.”
The HRLA maintains that when laws designed to protect vulnerable groups are weaponised to silence professional opinion or criticism, the public square shrinks and the space for honest debate is lost.
“Jasmine’s case connects directly to HRLA’s broader work defending Australians who face adverse action for speaking or acting in line with their convictions. Whether it’s professionals in the workplace, volunteers in community organisations, or individuals in public discourse, we are seeing patterns of censorship, social shame, and legal threat.
“The outcome of the QCAT matter will matter not just to Jasmine Sussex but to every Australian who values the ability to express their opinions – respectfully, robustly and truthfully – on matters of public interest.
“HRLA remains committed to representing those who stand for women’s and children’s rights, to preserving free speech, and to ensuring that no Australian is punished simply for speaking the truth or expressing a belief grounded in evidence and conscience.”
Meanwhile Kirralie Smith, the publisher of the Binary Australia website, which raises objections to transgender and LGBTQ activism, was found guilty last year of vilifying two males in female sport. She was ordered to pay $95,000 in damages and several other orders she described as contradictory.
Deputy Chief Magistrate Sharon Freund ordered Smith to undertake “anti-discrimination training”, take down the posts that publicly identified the football players, and issue public apologies for “misgendering” them.
In August, Smith and Binary Australia were found to have vilified two trans women in social media posts. Smith and Binary were liable for $100,000 in damages for vilifying one woman, and a further $100,000 for vilifying another.
Binary Australia was listed as an “far-right hate and extremist group” by the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism in 2022.
Mrs Smith managed to raise $250,000 from a national fundraiser to support her ongoing legal action and an eventual High Court case. On December 31st were successful in getting a stay on the orders so that her appeal can proceed to the Supreme Court of NSW.
“Tonight I will enjoy a medieval festival with 65 friends in my paddock,” she posted on New Year’s Eve.
“Tomorrow I will continue to stand for reality. In 2026, just like every other year in history – men will not be women.”
The Human Rights Law Alliance is happy to take donations to support its work.
