By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
THE neo-conservatives of the President George W. Bush era (who seemed to be predominantly Jewish) put out a notorious document called Project for a New American Century (PNAC). It called for a series of US-led wars in the Middle East to overthrow existing governments and create a US-dominated international order.
Trump’s foreign policy looks alarmingly like PNAC. The first international leader Trump will be meeting is Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump recently ended a partial arms embargo against Israel and sent them monster bombs. Are they planning to flatten Gaza entirely?
Trump has campaigned strongly against US involvement in foreign wars and he is not proposing any as far as we know, although his arming of Israel with big bombs appears to show that he is serious about his threat to create “unleash hell” for Israel’s Islamist enemies if they misbehave.
The war that Trump is now waging is primarily employing tariffs but also carries the implied threat of military intervention into Greenland, a territory of Denmark, the Panama Canal and even, astonishingly, Canada. He has just imposed 25% tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada and a further 10% on Chinese goods.
Canada and Mexico are planning to reciprocate but they are also responding to Trump’s demands for stronger borders. Globalists don’t like tight borders. China, meanwhile, is threatening to take the US to the World Trade Organisation over the latest tariffs. Trump’s likely response is a prominent middle finger.
China plays a major role in the global liberal order, aka new world order. They have more than 1140 coal-fired power stations, plus nuclear, plus hydro and are taking over world vehicle production while other western nations deindustrialize and buy all the Chinese stuff and fret over their carbon footprint.
China is also very clearly the target of Trump’s foreign policy, especially in Panama where the CCP appears to gradually taking control by buying ports on either end and building a bridge over the canal.
The global establishment is shocked by Trump’s trade war. The Washington Post quoted a leading economist from the Rothschild-Cadbury-Agnelli-Schroder owned Economist Intelligence Unit as saying these new tariffs “would bring the average US tariffs rate back to levels seen in the 1940s”, which “would effectively reverse decades of trade agreements to reduce tariffs. Globalization is over.”
Anyone who has studied some US history will know that the US was truly an industrial power in the 1940s. Is this what Trump is aiming for? Perhaps.
One thing Trump is doing is turning the so-called “global liberal order” on its head and taking America back to economic isolation and self-dependency. But at the same time he appears to be embarking on some sort of neocon-style expansionist policy aka the neoconservatives’ “New American Century”.
Neoconservatives like John Bolton, Bill Kristol and Dick Cheney have been among Trump’s most bitter opponents. Was this some sort of double-cross political strategy on their behalf or has Trump just borrowed the general idea?
Or is Trump using a “shock and awe” strategy, his own “great reset” to throw the global liberal order off balance while he goes about his reforms.
The question is, will a US-dominated world be preferable to an Agenda 2030 world in which human beings are “the carbon which must be eliminated”? Already in the UK, as recently revealed by Senator Malcolm Roberts, moves are afoot to calculate each individual’s carbon footprint.
The UK, under globalist zealot Keir Starmer, is already offering a “UK Zero App”, which is supposed to help galvanize Britons in the holy war against carbon. The app pushes all the global warming hysteria and Britons who are stupid enough to download it, will be able to get daily dumps of climate claptrap.
This is the micro-managed totalitarian world that “they” have planned for us. The big question is whether Trump can turn the ship around. His vision is to “drill, baby, drill”, that is, boost oil production and bring its price down and stimulate the economic growth hated by the green elites.
