By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
COULD a million Britons stand up for traditional English freedoms and become leaders in an emerging global anti-globalist populist revolution? Yes, according the British Freedom Party.
A supporter of this party contacted CairnsNews.org in the wake of the disastrous Labor win in the UK election, assuring us all was not lost and that Starmer’s party would merely hasten societal breakdown and act as the last throw of the dice for the duopoly – perhaps akin to “the Biden effect” – and fueling the populist revolt.
Across the channel in France a similar outcome may have to be contemplated if the snake Emmanuel Macron, severely outvoted by Marine Le Pen’s National Rally party last week, slithers into favour with the French leftist parties in order to create a controlling coalition in the Assembly.
Our informant says that despite Labor’s massive number of seats won, a large number of voters, especially those on the Conservative side, were missing from the voting register. “They did not switch to other Parties, – but simply refused to vote, i.e. they are no longer giving their consent to be ruled over.”
That was a critical piece of intelligence that was missing when we gave a relatively brief and rather cynical report on the election. “This gives the appearance of a large Labour win, when in reality, the Labour vote was down, but appeared as a large win due to so many people refusing to vote. This is what the stats are showing,” our informant wrote.
“Most Brits have now given up on the voting process and are more concerned with rebuilding their communities without central government. In true British spirit, the real Brits are networking and starting to dig in. This is where things are going,” he said.
“In my opinion, the British Freedom Party are looking good, as they are expanding, and are well connected with authentic populist groups in Europe. They are currently looking at mobilising Britain’s long established tradition of fighting men – all ‘one million’ of them. Connections are well established and fund raising is well under way.”
While maintaining an internet presence, BFP says most of its material is now disseminated in the old fashioned format of snail-mail and door-to-door canvassing to allow activists to make real world connections with their community.
Real-world, personal contact also helps people to easily disprove any lies or character defamations spread by the media about BFP and its alleged “far right fascism”.
‘Vote winning’ therefore is not being done in government polling booths, but on streets, and especially at football stadiums with their massive population bottlenecks, where huge numbers are reached without squandering limited resources running around town. BNP is currently looking for help to distribute 100,000 flyers at football matches.
The British Freedom Party is certainly no big vote winner, having evolved from various “far right” movements like the British National Party and the English Defence League (EDL) and even some association with Farage’s parties. BFP notes wryly that the EDL under Tommy Robinson has now become the English and Jewish Defence League.
BFP’s policies are fairly straightfoward and align with those of other nationalist, anti-globalist populist parties across Europe. BNP calls for the preservation of “the traditions, freedoms and the very existence of the British people”, as opposed to the WEF-UN-EU “model” of multicultural nations whose ultimate loyalty is to the neo-Marxist values of elite global institutions and corporations. The latter corporate government is actual fascism, by definition.
The BFP is “a party dedicated to the Christian values of our nation and we reject the evils of abortion, gay marriage and multiculturalism”. It further supports traditional masculine and feminine traits and rejects feminist ideology that demonizes and promotes hatred of men.
In addition the BFP demands the cessation of all gender ideology and sex education teaching in schools, the right of parents to choose religious education for children, opposes religious slaughter of animals and opposes “liberalist bastardisation of religious institutions”. Importantly, the BFP recognises that British freedom must acknowledge the Magna Carta as supreme law.
One of the outspoken voices for the BFP is Jayda Fransen, who was jailed for 36 weeks for calling an Islamic man a “paedophile” and “foreigner” and approaching an address she believed belonged to a Muslim defendant on a rape trial.
Fransen says she’s not against people of other races, but simply doesn’t believe that England should be the place for people from everywhere around the world – particularly Islamic people who demand that their religion be the “rule of law” in England.
In other words, Fransen and the BFP believe in cultural homogeneity. She says white, indigenous Britons are already a minority in London, Birmingham and other parts of the country. That may have something to do with the Labor Party winning this month’s national election.
Fransen’s “indigenous white nation” argument would not wash in Australia and New Zealand, where the indigenous people are non-white European, but the idea is far from unique in a world where numerous countries are racially and religiously homogenous by tradition. We can see that in China, Japan, Korea, Vietnam, and various African and Middle Eastern nations and South Pacific Islands.
Ironically, non-white indigenous peoples are championed by the UN under its UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (UNDRIP), while white indigenous Britons and Europeans are not. The long-established Marxist and neo-Marxist “post-colonial theory” narrative is that black indigenous rule is acceptable but white indigenous rule is racist and evil.
In the English colonial models (Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the US), national identity under the rule of Christian-based constitutional and common law, if properly administered, can accommodate and benefit both indigenous and colonist together. But this model has been under relentless attack by the Marxists and New Left for the past century since Lenin’s National and Colonial Questions paper was circulated worldwide in the 1920s.
The former Australian Communist Party member Geoff MacDonald, author of Red Over Black and The Evidence, warned in the 1980s that mass immigration is “a military strategy”, and mass migration is exactly what we have seen taking place on the US southern border and across Europe in recent years with UN and globalist NGOs financing refugee and migrant movements across the globe.
This might also be called a strategy of tension, given that Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand are facing housing shortages due to property price inflation facilitated by governments unwilling to finance large scale housing and the business of property speculation.
