From Revive Truth
The world is terrified Trump and Putin might trigger WW3 with threats and counter threats upping the ante for another Cold War but the truth lies elsewhere.
Russia and the United States since the 1960’s have been locked into a joint space program setting up bases on the Moon and the likelihood of either country facing off in a nuclear conflagration is pure theatre. https://youtu.be/EP-5tLp5xv8
The truth is that “nuclear” weapons do not even exist at all – they are just big bombs, and nothing more. Nuclear radiation, etc, is a total myth, a fiction, and a fraud. The purpose of this scientific fraud is government control and fear. It is used as propaganda.
Yes, nuclear bombs are simply large bombs. They are measured in TNT equivalent because they are simply large bombs. Atomic bombs use plutonium or uranium to create an explosion. But plutonium and uranium, contrary to what you have been told, are virtually harmless. Caffeine is far more deadly than uranium or plutonium. A bottle of caffeine pills can kill 4 grown men, but one person can swallow an equivalent bottle of uranium, and suffer no harm, according to Galen Winsor.
Galen Winsor is a nuclear physicist of renown who worked at, and helped design, nuclear power plants in Hanford, WA; Oak Ridge, TN; Morris, IL, San Jose, CA; Wimington, NJ. Among his positions of expertise he was in charge of measuring and controlling the nuclear fuel inventory and storage. He served in the Navy during World War II, returning home to help design and operate the first nuclear power plant in Hanford, WA – and many power plants thereafter.
Galen Winsor has traveled and lectured all over America, spoken on national talk radio, and made several videos exposing the misunderstood issues of nuclear radiation. He shows that fear of radiation has been exaggerated to scare people … so a few powerful people can maintain total control of the world’s most valuable power resource. Winsor did eventually die……in 2008, at the age of 86 after regularly eating uranium in front of audiences for many years from which he suffered no ill effects.
Galen Winsor(video) says the truth is “radiation” from a “nuclear bomb” is not some aerosolized invisible deadly toxin floating around in the air that can make anyone who comes near “instantly sick” and cause them to experience deformities and die or turn lizards into Godzilla. That is the realm of fantasy, it is a complete and total fiction.”
Q: Can nuclear radiation cause mutation in people and animals?
Galen Windsor: If a cell gets too much radiation, it dies. And so if it is a sperm or an oocyte, why, they die. They don’t reproduce, and there are no mutations. I think the good Lord built that safety factor in.
Q: So you’re saying that mutation in future generations is an unfounded fear?
Galen Windsor: Yes. And the studies of the people at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have borne that out. Those people do not have that.
In fact, “nuclear radiation” is merely some extra (very very few extra) free radicals, which are molecules with unpaired electrons that cause damage on a microscopic level, a type of damage that is the same that we experience when we go for a walk in the park, causing our metabolism to produce the byproduct of free radicals, which our bodies are naturally designed to repair and defend against.
Additionally, antioxidants are in the food we eat, and assist in this repair by “absorbing” the free radicals – that is, vitamins like Vitamin C found in orange juice and most foods, act as a buffer that stop a free radical in its tracks. Just the existence of “antioxidants” in your body will protect against free radical damage.
But “nuclear bombs” have an extremely small amount of “radiation”, that is, free radicals emitted through “ionizing radiation”, and this is spread over many miles in every direction. A single molecule of uranium isn’t going to hurt anyone. Uranium and plutonium are no more harmful than your own metabolism, especially because they are in such tiny quantities. The whole Geiger counter and gas masks trope is a Hollywood production and nothing more.
The Hiroshima and Nagasaki Hoax
And Hiroshima and Nagasaki? The scientific evidence supports that these cities were firebombed, not blown up by “nukes”. People very close to the supposed center of the explosion did not show any signs of severe irradiation. In Nagasaki, people reportedly survived in “primitive hillside shelters, practically at ground zero,” where they were “unharmed by the atomic blast, heat, and radiation” .
Also, we never experienced the hundreds of years of nuclear fallout predicted by scientists, but rather plants began growing weeks after the battle. There was no nuclear radiation from Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There were also no lasting effects, the city was rebuilt in the same place right away, and there were no generational mutations or other lasting effects from “radiation”.
The same is true with Chernobyl (which is overgrown with plants as shown in the image), there was no radioactive fallout. Also in the desert and the testing sites where they detonate nuclear weapons, there is no lasting harm to the local wildlife or plants. Why? Because there is no such thing as nuclear radiation.
There is a book which provides the evidence that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not blown up by a “nuclear bomb”, entitled “Death Object: Exploding The Nuclear Weapons Hoax”. Just like 9/11, the science and evidence supports a different story about nuclear weapons than what Hollywood and governments and the media portray.
“Nuclear fallout” from nuclear power plants melting down is a hoax
Do you know how nuclear power plants work? They are simply steam powered. They heat up uranium and plutonium “rods” and turn water into steam. The steam is then used to generate electricity. Nothing more!
Q: Well, in your estimation then, how dangerous is a nuclear reactor plant?
Galen Windsor: A nuclear reactor plant is just a way to boil water that’s the cleanest, neatest, most economical way to boil water that you’ve ever seen. And so in my estimation, nuclear reactors ought to be insured under the same insurance policy as any other steam boiler plant, power generating plant, and to have special consideration under the Price-Anderson Act, that means that the insurance industry has already paid off the Congress so that they can have a rip off, charging ever and higher and higher insurance premiums, total coverage much, much greater for a nonexistent risk. What a racket.
What does it mean if a “nuclear power plant” “melts down”? It simply means that the rods overheated which caused some damage to the equipment. It doesn’t really mean much of anything. There is no danger from a nuclear power plant melting down other than the fact that they generate a lot of electricity which will be cut off for a bit until they repair it, and there is a danger of an explosion – a normal explosion just like can happen with any machinery that is mishandled.
Q: Can a nuclear plant explode?
Galen Windsor: Only like any other steam plant, like Laughlin, Nevada, had a steam explosion. It’s a coal-fired plant, but six men were killed there last year. That could happen at a nuclear plant, but as far as an atomic explosion? Good heavens, no. No way.
What about Chernobyl? What really happened at Chernobyl is that 5% of the already extremely small quantity of “radioactive” aka free radical-emitting molecules, were emitted into the environment due to an explosion. It was a virtually harmless incident, but because of all the lies and myths about “nuclear radiation”, it ended up becoming a famous global incident and people entered needlessly with hazmat suits to “clean up” the area.
Clean up? All that means is they collected the debris from the explosion. Was it a nuclear explosion? No, it was simply an explosion. Explosions happen at other facilities too when people do things wrong. But nuclear facilities are basically steam facilities, and they are considered the safest and “cleanest” form of energy. Of course it’s the safest and cleanest, it is simply steam energy. It’s equally as safe as a hydroelectric dam. A hydroelectric dam can also blow up and cause a lot of damage if someone does something wrong. It’s not in any way mysterious. People can get hurt from an explosion, but there is no real danger of anything “nuclear”.
Scientists admit that there is no way to “clean up” an area of “radioactive radiation”, because it is fictional. It isn’t real. If it was real, you could clean it up, just like an oil spill or other real chemical spill. But it is not real. There is not “radioactive fallout”, that’s all media propaganda just like the “coronavirus” or its fictional “variants”.
As a safety director of a nuclear facility in the 50s, Galen used to go swimming in the water and drinking it – the so called “nuclear waste” water that was forbidden to enter by government regulation. He did so to prove that it was harmless, he was one of the top nuclear scientists who designed and headed much of the industry until the government started encroaching by regulating what he knew to be false. Galen Windsor lived until age 86 and died of Parkinson’s, which has nothing to do with radiation.
Footage from nuclear bombs detonations are all edited (above)
Here is a video which describes how supposed “nuclear detonations” are merely Hollywood productions, that no full unedited footage is ever shown, constant cut scenes, heavy editing, timelapse footage, and more. And the real shocker will be when you ask yourself: who’s filming this? A house is getting blown down but the camera man in the lot across the street is still standing?
Even the witnesses are told to close their eyes, turn their backs, and put on all this protective gear. Protective gear for what? If you’re at a safe distance, why would you need to don a full suit, except as psychological reinforcement, just like fabric face masks to protect against a supposed “virus”, when real bacterial contamination requires a full hazmat suit.
World War 3
What should be made clear is that if there was a World War 3 and these megabombs aka “nuclear” weapons were used, what would be the result? Certainly, big bombs could cause a lot of destruction. But it would not be the destruction of the whole Earth, just a couple cities. It would be no different than a standard war. A world war is bigger than a smaller war, but there will be no “nuclear holocaust” or “dark winter”.
A mega war with these large “atomic bombs” and “thermonuclear bombs” could cause a lot of damage, but not everywhere. It would mainly occur in only a few major cities, and only the ones hit. Other cities even nearby would only be impacted economically and technologically. Trade would be disrupted, and there would likely be huge power outages in those areas. But this is nothing more than what happens in any war zone, just with higher casualties.
It is estimated that only 13,080 nuclear warheads exist on Earth today. Over 2,000 nuclear bombs have been detonated in the last 80 years, and yet we suffer no global “radioactive fallout” from them. You could say that all these were spread out over decades and only done in remote test sites, but that does not matter. You can go to any of these test sites today and suffer no ill effects, because there is no radioactive fallout.
