
By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
IT apparently wasn’t enough for UK cops and Keir Starmer’s courts to jail a few rioters and others for allegedly inciting violence via Facebook posts. The arrests of Starmer regime critics are continuing.
Recently at 4am UK cops arrived at the home of a man “arrested for expressing his opinion on Facebook about a Palestinian flag”, according to a post on the British Defence League page on X.
Supporters or neighbours of the man shouted out “embarrassing! embarrassing! Because he mentioned Palestine!” as the arrest took place. “‘E gets arrested because he mentioned Hamas on Facebook,” shouted a woman with a thick northern England accent.
We don’t know the details of the arrest, but Katie Hopkins, in a recent vlog, explained that all that the UK Malicious Communications Act required in these social media cases was that someone “perceived” they had been offended and/or hated by a social media post and now this was coming to haunt members of the UK media.
Hopkins herself was forced to fight these laws when she was subjected to a series of “complaints”. She ended up selling her home to finance a High Court defence.
She said “the very brilliant” UK Telegraph columnist Alison Pearson had “a knock on her door by two members of Starmer’s Stasi unit” (Essex police) on Remembrance Sunday, wanting to know about a Tweet she made more than year ago and had deleted. The cops refused to name the person who complained or the subject matter of the tweet.
It is understood Essex Police made two assessments of the complaint before opening an investigation under section 17 of the Public Order Act 1986, relating to material allegedly “likely or intended to cause racial hatred”.
It turns out that Pearson’s original tweet after the October 7 attack in Israel, misidentified a Pakistani flag for a Palestinian flag, and contained comments about police appearing to be protecting Palestinians.
Meanwhile a Sky News UK investigation has discovered that foreign online entities were involved in fanning the UK riots in July that Starmer blamed on the UK “far-right”.
“He was gaslighting the entire nation to cover up what happened in Southport. When the truth finally comes out, Starmer will be in serious trouble,” said political commentator Lee Harris.
Meanwhile the pro-Israel British Defence League claimed Keir Starmer in 2003 defended the Rwandan father of the boy charged with the killing of three girls in Southport, but failed to provide court records as evidence of this.
The BDL alleges Starmer defended the killer’s father against extradition to Rwanda where he was wanted for more than 100 MURDERS during the genocide in that country.
“Starmer … secured his freedom and new identity in this country, allowing him to roam free and produce the Southport killer, who was Muslim and did have links to terrorism, despite the lies told by the government when they jailed anyone who were asking questions in the streets and on social media,” the EDL posted on X.
“This is why MP’s have been gagged in the commons from asking anything to do with this sad sorry story. @KeirStarmer has the blood of 3 infant innocent girls all over him.”
But a public note on X said the allegation was not supported by court records, which showed Starmer as a QC defending a woman against deportation.
However the case of the boy arrested and charged with the the girls’ murders has revealed that police found he downloaded an “Al Qaeda manual” called Military Studies In The Jihad Against The Tyrants and had produced an amount of the deadly poison risin at his home – a rather curious development for a boy and family described as Christians.
Merseyside Police Chief Constable Serena Kennedy gave a long and very carefully worded statement to the media , making the point “I recognise that these new charges may lead to speculation. The matter for which Axel Rudakubana has been charged under the Terrorism Act does not require motive to be established. For a matter to be declared as a terrorist incident, motivation would need to be established. I would strongly advise anyone against speculating as to the motivation in this case.”
That sounds suspiciously like another threat to social media users who might dare to speculate about involvement of intelligence agencies involved in some Manchurian candidate black op, or some such thing.