Lenin’s Socialism Rewired by Today’s Democrats’ Socialism
By John L, Kachelman, Jr.
There is a maddening repetition in civilization. The national rise-and-fall pattern is the common thread. Mankind never learns, never studies, never accepts reality. Mankind always embraces a delusional blindness. This blind eye excuses, embraces, and enjoys a fancied invincible hubris. The cyclical repetition is amazing. A nation’s “rise and fall” is not Rome’s exclusivity.
How does this happen? Why are citizens complacent regarding their nation’s existence?
Elizabeth Willing Powel’s political fervor is discovered in a notation from Secretary of War James McHenry’s journal. He wrote on September 18, 1787, “A lady asked Dr. Benjamin Franklin, “Well, Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?” “A republic,” replied the Doctor, “if you can keep it.”
Consider Vladimir Lenin’s position on breaking national laws to achieve revolution. The general populace, largely complacent, accepted the revolution. Lenin based his position on a pragmatic Marxist theory viewing the national law not as an objective moral framework, but as an instrument of class rule. The populace was deceived and complacent. Reread that sentence in light of today’s Democrat (Socialist) Party insistence that crimes are only an issue of “class struggles”! Many complacently shrug this off as “Democrat Extremist.”
A regurgitation of the “rise and fall”
Look closer and listen to Lenin’s directives ruling today’s Democrat Socialist Party.
Lenin argued that laws in a capitalist state exist only to maintain the power of the ruling Elite. Therefore, a revolutionary party has no moral obligation to respect the laws they view as “oppressive.” Lenin’s approach to breaking laws was a tactical strategy. Chaos resulted, but it was not the objective. The objective was destroying the governing law.
Marxist revolutionaries are dedicated to erasing personal freedom and requiring all to bow to the State. They believe that by destroying the old political and economic structures, there will be a victorious new society where individuality no longer exists.
Critical to Marxism/Leninism/Maoism, etc., is the position that the Christian religion and current civil laws are ideologies of the suppressing classes—thus they maintain that a godless and lawless culture brings utopia. Their interest is solely in actions that replace existing civil laws and mores based upon the Bible.
When placed into power, Lenin made laws for tactical reasons that benefited the revolutionary cause. Lenin’s manipulation of the law was a tool for political principles based upon expediency, harsh oppression, and undermining the law’s protections, guaranteeing individual, religious, and economic freedoms.
Here is a shocking fact…Lenin was bitter in condemning national laws BUT the Bolsheviks issued 1,033 decrees in the first 400 days to control the population! Here is the exposure of the “revolutionaries.” Their concern was SELFISH. Their action was SELFISH. Their word cloaked SELFISHNESS!
These political warriors, these cultural warriors, are hypocrites consumed with SELFISHNESS! They only care about how to use others to accomplish their SELFISHNESS! They damn the law but then make thousands of laws to legalize their evil!
Again, realize this is a redundant, historical, factual cycle regarding nations and empires.
Listen to this troubling assessment from 1925:
“Legality is not an ‘empty sack’ that can be filled with a new class content immediately after the revolution, and under the New Economic Policy the legal form must be used as a weapon in a programme of cultural re‑education…This (new legal) collection was intended as the first systematic expression of the Marxist jurists (manipulate the Courts to sanction the evil). Legal definitions may correspond to the progressive development of these relations.”
The revolution requires cooperative jurists who are devoted to the revolutionary cause and who will redefine the law and flagrantly ignore the law, enabling the “progressive development” to proceed.
Analyzing the present-day Democrat Party
Do you want an analysis of the lunacy supported by today’s Democrat Party? Here it is—it is “part and parcel” of a planned revolution to strip the United States of America of its governing law, cultural guardrails, the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the national Congress.
The revolutionaries do not respect any of the foundations guarding the greatness of our nation. Perhaps the clearest exposure of this contempt for law is how low-level jurists ignore the Supreme Court’s decisions! And the Democrat Party’s answer is to ignore the law and add to the Supreme Court so its decisions will “correspond” to the revolution! (Do you hear echoes of Lenin?)
The weapons of the rise and fall
A careful study of Engles/Marx and the weaponization of their theory by Lenin/Stalin/Mao (and history adds the Democrats/RINOS/Deep Staters) reveals that the real revolutionary movement disorganizes the government and fuels those believing they are economically denied. BUT the most sobering fact is that these revolutionaries seek to remove compliance with “antiquated laws.” They seek to replace unity and national pride with a babbling, insane dissension and cowardly wavering.
If the Democrat Socialist-Revolutionary Party understood this truth, it would realize the practical harm of their ideological poverty. They would turn away from their deceitful approach to the fundamental problems of socialism. Here is a truth that is too blunt: they will never understand that it is not the forces of the government but those of the revolution that are disorganized.
The very foundation upon which they establish their demands and manipulate the control of their minions is the rejection of “law,” BUT they find only disarray because without “law” they are fundamentally disorganized, and each is a law to themselves!
This hypocrisy pattern follows Machiavelli’s “The Prince.” This writing is advice for rulers and those who aspire to rule by using force and fraud. He instructs republican citizens and leaders (this includes the United States) to recognize how vulnerable the government is and to be vigilant against the threats of tyranny. Machiavelli personally experienced the repetitive history of nations falling victim to ambitious individuals who sought to subvert their nations’ practices and institutions so they could rule unchecked.
Machiavelli also wrote “Discourses on Livy.” In the “Discourses,” Machiavelli examines how the Roman republic was overthrown by a single leader. Machiavelli’s examination of Roman history stresses that a republic is fragile. It requires constant vigilance on the part of both the citizens and their leaders.
National vigilance is difficult to maintain because citizens and leaders alike become complacent and fail to be alarmed by ambitious citizens harboring the desire for absolute rule.
If republican citizens fail to be vigilant, eventually individual freedoms are threatened, restricted, and ultimately erased.
Where are “we the people”?
The troubling question asks why public complacency is leading our republic to be lost. Will the American republic fall to the same perils that Machiavelli identified in ancient Rome, Renaissance Florence, and that Lenin utilized to replace law with his law?
Will we complacently listen to a modernized version of Lenin’s socialism, “no laws” being spewed by the politicians in the Democrat Party/RINOS/DEEP STATE?
Perhaps there is still time to reject socialism by the mid-term elections. Those seeking office only to enhance their own power and further the revolutionary objectives of erasing our great Republic must be defeated. Perhaps it is too late because the population is complacent in their attitudes and complicit in the law’s erasure.
Listen to today’s revolutionary “Cry Babies”
- They cry against the prevailing laws, even when issues are adjudicated by the Constitution.
- They cry that the Constitution must be dismissed.
- They cry out new definitions about what laws mean.
- They cry out against “class oppression” to maneuver themselves into an oppressive class.
- They cry out against the “Elites” while they live as the Elites.
One has stated: “Under the Big Tent is always a circus!” And I add that in that circus, the Ring Master never cleans up the elephant poop—he views himself as above that position. And so, it is with those advocating a “Big Tent” in today’s politics. Look closely and observe that the loudest advocates of the revolution are the least involved. They always get someone else to dirty their hands while they claim “no association” and sit ensconced within the beltway!
Ancient Wisdom speaks to the current complacency of those who remain silent and those who applaud allowing the revolutionary Democrat Party and its socialism to erase our great Republic: “The complacency of fools will destroy them” (The Bible, Proverbs 1:32)
