KIWI Covid vaccine whistleblower Barry Young has compared data on the vaccine to “a crucifix to a vampire”, in an ongoing court case.
Counsel for the New Zealand government, aka the Crown, actually refused to show the vaccine data that Young leaked to a judge, who ordered it to be produced in pre-trial proceedings.
Young has been charged under section 252 of the Crimes Act 1961 for accessing a computer for a dishonest purpose, and faces potential prison time. He has pleaded not guilty and elected a trial by jury.
In court the Crown gave the data spreadsheet to their own expert witness, Professor Robert Scragg of Auckland University, but then refused to provide it to the court. Professor Bragg is the same expert who claimed the vaccine was “so safe he didn’t even need to look at it”.
“When challenged on proper procedure, they initially agreed, then backtracked weeks later claiming it was “too hard,” and are now actively refusing to show the evidence to the judge,” Young told journalist Liz Gunn.
“Barry suggests that the only logical reason is that they are terrified of what the data actually shows,” says Gunn .
“It’s like a crucifix to a vampire. They cannot look at it because they’re just terrified of it. And that’s been apparent throughout, even with this latest hearing,” said Young.
He pointed out that the judge, to his credit, told the court “I want to see the data.”
“They [The Crown] gave the spreadsheet to their professor, their expert witness, they gave the data to him. The one who said, “It’s such a safe vaccine… that I don’t need to look at it.” Yep, Professor [Robert] Scragg, of Auckland University,” Young told Gunn.
“And the judge said, as a matter of procedure, if you show the evidence to the expert, the court expects to see it as well. That’s process 101. And the Crown said, “Oh, yes, if it would benefit the court, we will produce the data. We will give it to the court.”
“However, they backtracked a couple of weeks later on that statement, which they made at the voir dire (the process of questioning potential jurors).
“They backtracked on it and said, “We’ve had a look and it’s too hard. So we’re not going to give the court that evidence, that data. So we’re not going to show it to them,” said Young.
“They just denied it. And so it goes round and round, but they are absolutely refusing to look at it. They are refusing to show it to the judge. And the reason why they’re refusing to look at it is clearly because they’re terrified of it.”
Our main picture is a screenshot from a video made by Gunn and Young that summarizes the leaked data. The first batch shows 152 deaths from 711 doses – a shocking 21% mortality rate. Other mortality rates range from 4.5% to 17%. Young says 0.75% is considered a normal mortality rate.
Meanwhile NSW Libertarian candidate Craig Kelly says the US Federal Drug Administration (FCA) has finally acknowledged that the Covid injections killed healthy children.
“I knew this happening and was being covered up. That’s why I got emotional in Parliament,” he said, referring to a speech he made as a Liberal-turned-independent MP back in 2021.
“Our bureaucrats were making decisions that would result in healthy children dying unnecessarily and the media were covering it up, while the social media platforms censored anyone trying to sound the alarm.
“And 99% of the politicians were happy to go along with it all because they were either too frightened to say anything, too lazy to do any research, or too dumb to understand the data.”
According to Google AI the FDA has acknowledged allegations that COVID-19 vaccines caused the deaths of at least 10 children, “but this occurred through an internal, highly contested memo written by a newly appointed agency official rather than a consensus scientific determination by the entire agency”.
