Call for Federal investigation as Gates-pharma links to judge raised in doctor’s complaint – www.cairnsnews.org

Call for Federal investigation as Gates-pharma links to judge raised in doctor’s complaint – www.cairnsnews.org
Wangaratta GP Dr Julian Fidge … challenging big pharma’s dangerous mRNA vaccines.

A FEDERAL Court judge who threw out an injunction to prevent Pfizer and Moderna from distributing their mRNA Covid vaccines, is the subject of a legal complaint alleging she failed to reveal her links to the pharmaceutical industry.

Law firm PJ O’Brien & Associates is calling on the Federal Parliament to investigate Justice Helen Rofe’s conduct, as is their prerogative under Section 72(2) of the Constitution.

The last time a Parliamentary investigation into potential misbehaviour of a judge was established under Section 72(2) of the Constitution was in the case of Justice Lionel Murphy, in May 1986. The investigation was discontinued when Justice Murphy announced that he had received a terminal cancer diagnosis. Justice Murphy passed away in October 1986.

The complaint against Justice Rofe on behalf of Dr Julian Fidge, alleges serious misconduct possibly rising to misbehaviour by the failure to disqualify herself or disclose her significant prior relationship with Pfizer.

Dr Fidge’s injunction had alleged that the vaccines contain unlicenced genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which is a criminal offence in Australia under the Gene Technology Act 2000. However on March 1 Justice Rofe dismissed the case on the matter of standing, saying it could not succeed.

A media statement from PJ O’Brien & Associates said if the action were successful, it would carry serious financial and reputational damage to both Pfizer and Moderna and as respondents, Pfizer and Moderna stood to benefit from Justice Rofe’s dismissal of the case.

“The complaint against Justice Rofe alleges serious misconduct possibly rising to misbehaviour by the failure to disqualify herself or disclose her significant prior relationship with Pfizer,” the law firm said.

“Justice Rofe was appointed to the Federal Court on 12 July 2021 after being called to the Bar in 2001. When at the Bar, Justice Rofe directly and indirectly represented Pfizer on at least five occasions between the years 2003-2006.

“Additionally, Justice Rofe has substantial affiliations and associations with the pharmaceutical and scientific research industry. Her Honour’s extended family established the Grimwade family pharmaceutical fortune and later ran leading Australian biomedical research organisation the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI).

“The WEHI has received funding of hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars and over US$30 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.”

The complaint also notes that professionally, Justice Rofe sat on the Bolton Clarke Human Research and Ethics Committee for 10 years and Bolton Clark received significant grant money from the judge’s cousin, the late Sir Andrew Grimwade CBE, in his role as chairman of the Felton Bequests Committee. Sir Andrew was honorary president of the WEHI for 14 years, serving on the board from 1963 to 1992.

“In view of these allegations, PJ O’Brien & Associates is calling on the Upper and Lower Houses of Parliament to investigate Justice Rofe’s conduct, as is their prerogative under Section 72(2) of the Constitution,” the law firm partners said.

Katie Ashby-Koppens, instructing solicitor with the law firm, said judges were duty bound to disclose not only potential conflicts, but also perceived conflicts. “Failing to disclose this information is not just a breach of common courtesy, but is a breach of the judicial obligations of a sitting judge,” she said.

“There are 17 judges who sit on the Federal Court Melbourne Registry. Justice Rofe was not the only judge available to hear the matter. Justice Rofe’s dismissal of our case should be voided and our matter should be heard by a judge with no presenting conflicts, as should all matters in the Australian judicial system.

“We have asked Chief Justice Mortimer to investigate our complaint. Additionally, we call on the Parliament of Australia to investigate allegations of misbehaviour of a sitting judge. If the allegations of misbehaviour are proven, the Parliament may remove Justice Rofe from the bench.”

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *