WHILE the world slowly wakes up to the mRNA contamination scandal, councillors in the municipality of Clarence, Tasmania, have voted down one councillor’s proposal for their council to join a national campaign to highlight the issue.
These councillors, who as public servants have a duty of care for public safety, dismissed a call backed by 17,000 doctors and medical scientists for Covid-19 vaccines to be withdrawn from circulation immediately.
Do these councillors consider themselves “better informed” than these doctors on medical issues or were they simply mentally incapable of understanding the gravity of the situation? No doubt these same alleged civic leaders would jump to the cause of some climate change policy “to save the planet”.
Government health departments and bodies like the TGA and AMA are sticking with their criminal lie that that the so-called Covid-19 vaccines are safe and effective while thousands of vaccine recipients in Australia and worldwide suffer myocarditis, turbo-cancers and sudden deaths.
Phillip Buckhaus, Professor of Cancer Molecular Genetics at the University of South Carolina, testified recently at the State’s Senate that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA. The state senators, unlike the Tasmanian council clowns, listened to the evidence.
“I’m kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this,” the professor said. “It could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest. This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix.”
He said this contaminant was different from RNA because it can be permanent and can theoretically cause a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue. “It’s also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. There’s probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine. This is a bad idea.”
In an email to supporters, Clarence Deputy Mayor Allison Ritchie, said she was pleased to second a motion that simply sought to request the State and Federal Governments take action to investigate legitimate public health concerns being raised by the community.
“I am sorry that the motion did not receive the support it deserved by fellow councillors,” she wrote.
“I further regret the unnecessary and offensive comments made by some councillors that in my view incorrectly linked the motion to some type of “anti-vaxxer” movement and denigrated the integrity and intelligence of those raising concerns and was not representative of the standards of behaviour and respect that the public should be able to expect from elected members.
“I congratulate and appreciate the efforts that the all petitioners and representors have, and I am sure, will continue to make in advocating for the safety of the public.”
